The Roman Hat Mystery by Ellery Queen

The Roman Hat Mystery
Ellery Queen
Originally Published 1929
Ellery Queen #1
Followed by The French Powder Mystery

One of the aims of this blogging project of mine was to broaden my reading horizons and to educate myself on the history of the genre. While I count myself pretty familiar with the works of Christie and Sayers, I had never read anything by Ellery Queen – one of the more significant figures from the Golden Age of Detective Fiction.

When I made the choice to begin with The Roman Hat Mystery, Queen’s first novel, I had little knowledge of what lay in store for me. Perhaps if I had read the less than glowing posts from JJ and The Green Capsule about the book, I might have been a little better prepared for seemed at times to be an epic test of my endurance.

Monte Fields, a lawyer, is discovered dead in his seat at the Roman Theatre during the second act of a show called Gunplay. Strangely, for a hit show, the seats on either side of him were empty and no one was observed coming up to him during the performance. Our detectives, Police Inspector Richard Queen and his son Ellery, immediately focus on the absence of the victim’s top hat – a discovery that will launch a very detailed and repetitive series of searches to try to find it and determine its significance to the murder.

While it is a little strange to hear the characters hone in so quickly on the question of the headwear as if it was the only significant oddity in a case that possesses several, I did find the questions of how and why the hat had disappeared to be intriguing. To my disappointment the answers, particularly with regards to how the hat was removed, proved far less interesting than the scenario seemed to promise.

Part of the problem is the way the authors walk us through nearly every step of the investigation, listing off the various places considered and examined along the way. These sections of the book feel exhausting and offer little interest or sense of discovery, slowing the novel down considerably.

When not considering the question of the hat, Richard and Ellery Queen spend considerable periods interviewing the various witnesses. Although ‘witnesses’ may be a little inaccurate, given that no one seems to have seen anything take place. These sections were a little more enjoyable for me, though once again the pacing is slow and the conversations are at times a little repetitive.

The two detectives are not particularly striking in terms of their personalities, though I did appreciate their father and son dynamic and enjoyed their warm sense of affection for one another. Both characters seem to be primarily characterized by their indulgences – Ellery for rare books and Richard for taking snuff – rather than their emotions or and peculiarities in their personalities. Both are quite normal, though Richard was for me easily the more sympathetic character.

Before I go on to sum up my overall feelings about the book, I do want to directly address two points I have seen made in other reviews of this novel. Firstly, that the novel does not play fair with the reader and, secondly, the story advances some outdated racial views.

Let me tackle the second point first. The Roman Hat Mystery certainly does have moments that feature or hint at outdated racial ideas. When one of those ideas is mentioned in the plot it is clear that we are not meant to be sharing in or celebrating those views. Modern readers may struggle with these aspects of the novel.

The issue of whether the novel plays fair is much harder to judge. Certainly I can understand some readers feeling frustrated that there was some information given near the end of the novel that was not clearly provided prior to the Challenge to the Reader. I do not believe that any information is imparted after that Challenge that we need to figure out what happened in general terms and while it is a little frustrating in a puzzle mystery to have some developments not shared with the reader, I did not feel cheated by that.

Overall, I found the novel to be quite uneven and poorly paced with lengthy blocks of dialogue and a dull array of suspects. While there are some strong and entertaining parts of the story, I did feel that all-in-all this was a miss for me. Still, I liked the concept of the story and I still plan on digging through the Ellery Queen novels in order.

On the back of this however I think it may be wise to spread them out a little.

17 thoughts on “The Roman Hat Mystery by Ellery Queen

    1. I made the mistake of audiobooking this one which made those long interviews play out in real time. I am glad to know I will at least have a strong ending to look forward to with the next.


  1. Hahahaha, yeah, this bloody book. I had such high hopes to dive in and find the joy of early Queen resonating through desne and complex puzzles that turned in a sentence into stratling puzzles and revelations…and what I got was this trudge. The first three Queens at least seem crammed with narrative lollygagging, as events unfold with galcial slowness amidst much dull conversation. And yet they’ve also written some absolutely stellar mysteries, so clearly there’s talent galore just waiting to be let out at some point in this early tranche,

    But, yeah, this and the next few may well make you want to space them out quite a lot…and the spaces will get larger, I fear, if you have the same response asme to the next one. I started out intending to rip through the Queen canon in its entirety in order, now I may just delve in here and there as the spirit (occasionally) takes me.


    1. I couldn’t help but feel that there waa an excellent short story or novella in The Roman Hat Mystery that somehow made an unfortunate transformation into a novel.

      I had intended to do these monthly but I think less frequent will probably do them and me some good.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Excellent or not, it definitely needed shortening. I’m also really not a fan of the whole Purloined Letter “we’ve searched everywhere and it’s definitely itely not here!” aspect of the plot. Irritated the hell out of me, that did.


      2. Me too. I was expecting a really clever hiding place based on ALL the build up and when the revelation occured I could only wonder why that wasnt the first place they looked!


  2. It’s hard to understand why Roman Hat is the way it is without knowing that the EQ cousins were imitating a current best-seller, S. S. Van Dine and his Philo Vance novels. Van Dine insisted, to quote Wikipedia, that “a detective novel should be mainly an intellectual puzzle that follows strict rules and does not wander too far afield from its central theme.” So priggish Ellery in the middle of a deliberately strict-form puzzle makes for what can be a very annoying book, in places. The cousins later rebelled against the Philo Vance style and struck out on their own. From the early “nationalities” books I recommend The Greek Coffin Mystery; an exciting story, a difficult puzzle, and Ellery starts to become a human being.


    1. Thanks Noah. I appreciate the background – Van Dine is another author I need to educate myself on. I will look forward to reaching The Greek Coffin Mystery and Ellery becoming a little more three dimensional!


  3. yeah early Ellery Queen is veryyyyyyyyy dry. Later Queen is more character focused (which can be a bit disturbing tbh). If you ever want to try Queen again I’d recommend The Chinese Orange Mystery. The only one I remember enjoying.


    1. Thanks for the recommendation. The frustrating part of this is that I liked bits of the book a lot – it was just there are all those other parts they put in to break your spirit like the where in the house is that top hat section…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s