Jonathan Creek: The Grinning Man (TV)

Episode Details

Originally broadcast January 1, 2009
2009 New Year’s Special
Preceded by Gorgons Wood
Followed by The Judas Tree

Written and directed by David Renwick

Familiar Faces

Sheridan Smith makes the first of three appearances as Joey Ross, a paranormal investigator. Smith at this time was probably best known for her role in hit sitcom Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps and since then has amassed some impressive credits and awards including two Olivier awards. To Doctor Who fans though she will always be Lucie Miller, companion to Paul McGann’s Doctor in the Big Finish audios.

Katherine Parkinson is probably more familiar to me today than she would have been back then. A year later she would appear with Alan Davies in Whites but she is probably best known for her role as Jen in The I. T. Crowd.

Finally, keep your eyes and ears peeled for an appearance by The Puppini Sisters, a close harmony trio, who perform Spooky during a garden party scene.

The Verdict

A pretty strong return after years away, The Grinning Man serves up two interesting impossibilities while also introducing us to a new assistant who makes a strong first impression.

Episode Summary

Since 1938 visitors staying in the attic room at a mansion have disappeared without a trace. When a young woman traveling with Joey Ross, a paranormal investigator, hears about the room after taking shelter at the mansion she decides she will check it out for herself. When history repeats itself the owner’s mother decides to call in Jonathan Creek to see if he can discover the truth behind the disappearances.

My Thoughts

When The Grinning Man originally aired it was the first new episode of Jonathan Creek in around five years so it is perhaps fitting that my post about the episode also marks something of a comeback given that it comes after a longer-than-expected three month hiatus. Happily it is nice to be able to start back on a positive note as I consider The Grinning Man, while not perfect, to be one of the better episodes of the show.

The best place to start is with its most striking problem – a series of disappearances, spread over a number of decades, of those staying in an attic room at a mansion named Metropolis. Yes, this is yet another house in Jonathan Creek with a frankly ridiculous name and here it doesn’t even tie into the story in any meaningful way other than to faintly suggest to us that the house was built in the thirties.

After being given a little bit of the room’s back story and its history of disappearances, the episode brings things right up to date with a fresh occurrence taking place in the present as a young woman disappears after volunteering to stay in the room on a dare. This is a pretty familiar setup for impossible crime stories set in supposedly cursed homes but that reflects that it is really effective. By making a room or house kill over a span of decades rather than just a few weeks, it builds up the mystique of that space and emphasizes that we are dealing with the sort of problem that has baffled people for years making it all the more impressive when Jonathan will finally work out how the trick has been done. This approach had worked really well in Mother Redcap, still one of my favorite episodes, and I think it is handled comparably well here.

It’s not just that the setup and structure of this mystery are effective – the solution also felt pretty satisfying too. This is partly a case of how it works mechanically but also the circumstances in which the reveal takes place. The realization of what happens brings about an excellent example of a race against time sequence that feels quite genuinely tense and creepy, being realized pretty effectively on screen.

The vanished woman, Mina, is a friend of paranormal investigator Joey Ross (played by Sheridan Smith) who will be Jonathan’s new assistant for this story as well as the next two specials. I will save my overall thoughts about the character for my post about her last story but I will say that I really like how she is introduced here and that I think Smith was inspired casting, offering something quite different from either of her predecessors.

Unlike Maddy and Carla, Joey feels far more of an equal to Jonathan on first appearance both in terms of her role in the story and also in her understanding of tricks and mechanisms that might be employed to give the illusion of an impossibility. This is particularly apparent in a fantastic sequence in which she shows Jonathan the attic space, preemptively explaining the things she has already checked in that space before he can even speak. It feels strikingly fresh, subverts some expectations, and reminded me a little of when Doctor Who introduced another Time Lord, Romana, to be the character’s companion in the later Tom Baker years or to bring it back to Creek, of Rik Mayall’s DI Gideon Pryke in Black Canary.

In addition to the main mystery Renwick gives us a second, pretty substantial impossibility. I don’t plan on describing that problem given how late it occurs in the episode but I would suggest that in a previous season it might well have sustained an entire episode on its own (I feel it is stronger than some primary plots in the previous few seasons). These two impossibilities work well together so I don’t want to suggest that one of these should have been cut but it does mean that the episode already seems really full. As a consequence the secondary, more comedic plots feel a little redundant and make the episode feel a little overstuffed.

One example of this would be the minor plot threads in which we trace Jonathan and Joey’s respective doomed relationships. I do want to stress that neither of these threads is bad and I can understand why Renwick wrote them, particularly Jonathan’s which provides a handy bit of closure for Carla’s story in her absence. It’s just that neither feels all that notable dramatically or comedically and so they end up getting in the way of the two mysteries, slowing the episode down.

Sidebar: Did I miss a bit that explains why Joey is having conversations with her boyfriend on a digital camera? It seems really bizarre.

The two relationships may have felt somewhat superfluous but the main offender here once again is the plot involving Jonathan’s boss. This time we follow Adam Klaus as he plans to invest in 3D porn and starts to date a star of that industry. Regardless of the question of comedic taste (my own take: it’s not great but its not as tasteless as The Seer of the Sands), it’s entirely extraneous to the episode’s main mystery plots, offering no connection at all to anything else that’s going on. Any time we cut away to it serves to really slow down the episode and given how disconnected it is, I feel the pacing of the piece would have benefited considerably from its excision.

Aside from those complaints about the pacing, my feelings about this are generally pretty positive. It is certainly on par with the the previous special, Satan’s Chimney, and I really enjoyed revisiting it. I love the dynamic between Jonathan and Joey here, found both mysteries intriguing and I was broadly satisfied by the resolution to each. Perhaps more than anything I felt happy to be back to Creek after my unplanned break which is nothing compared to how it felt to be back after five whole years!

Aidan Spoils Everything


Gur Obfpu cnvagvat znxrf sbe n fgevxvat ivfhny ohg qbrfa’g gur yvggyr rkcynangvba nobhg vg srry ernyyl gnpxrq ba? Vg’f n qnex erirny naq creuncf vagrerfgvat gb cynl, ohg jr qba’g xabj gur punenpgre jryy rabhtu sbe vg gb ernyyl ynaq nf fubpxvat. V nyfb qba’g xabj gung V nz va ybir jvgu gur jnl vg vf onfvpnyyl hfrq gb ervasbepr n jrnx zbgvir.

Wbrl’f ynpx bs na rzbgvbany erfcbafr gb gur qvfnccrnenapr naq yngre gur qvfpbirel bs gur pbecfr bs ure sevraq srryf n yvggyr bss, gubhtu V haqrefgnaq gung ure bja arne fpencr jvgu qrngu birejuryzf gur ynggre.

Nf pyrire nf gur ivqrb cyna vf zrpunavpnyyl, jung jbhyq Trffyre unir qbar vs gur jrngure pbaqvgvbaf jrer fhofgnagvnyyl qvssrerag ba gur qnl gung gur fvtugvat jnf fhccbfrq gb gnxr cynpr pbzcnerq jvgu gur qnl vg jnf svyzrq?

12 thoughts on “Jonathan Creek: The Grinning Man (TV)

  1. IIRC, this one was 2 hours long — easily the longest epidose of the entire series — and stuff like the weird talks Joey is havig with her boyfriend and (especially) the 3D porn is there simply because Renwick had never written an episode of this duration before and needed to fill out the time. And, boy, don’t you ever feel it.

    This is one of those cases where, I can’t help but feel, the revelation of the disappearance is better than the mystery: it seemed pretty obvious to me that there was only one place both people could have gone, but when you see it in action it’s probably one of the most brilliantly shocking moments in the entirety of JC’s run. To my eye the second impossibliity is inane beyond words, however. Just think of the amount of setting up required, plus the number of conspirators who would also have to be trusted to keep quiet…

    This is far from the nadir of the seires, and a good reminder that a lot of the impossibilities in these specials weren’t actually that bad…there was just so much redundant guff around them.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes – you definitely feel that length!

      I completely agree about the shock factor of that moment where you see how the trick is worked. There have been other Creek episodes where there is an action sequence coupled with the reveal of a solution (the first episode of the previous season for instance) but I think this is one of the best.

      Your points about the problems with the second impossibility make sense too. This is very reminiscent of a Carla Borrego plot and had a very similar problem. I did enjoy though that the way it was managed was somewhat different and felt quite original, even if it is improbable.


  2. This one CREEPED . . . ME . . . OUT!!!!!!!

    I will not return to this episode because that revelation made me feel actually sick. It’s good to know that there are enough flaws which I don’t remember (i.e. length) that I don’t really need to go there again.



  3. This is one of my favorite episodes, the mechanism of the locked room feels like the pinnacle of the kind of plots introduced in “Mother Redcap” and “Satan’s Chimney” and, while it may not be the most fairly clued of the episodes, it’s certainly one of the most devious (I can understand Brad getting creeped out by this one). I also really don’t mind the length of this one – after a hiatus, this feels like an epic return for Jonathan Creek. I would have been disappointed if there weren’t award subplots involving Adam’s latest scheme. This episode is definitely in my top five and one of the stories which I revisit frequently.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It definitely felt like an event at the time – I remember being surprised that it was coming back after such a long gap. I don’t think it will make my top 5 when the day comes to compile that list but it’s certainly top tier for me too.


  4. V nterr gung gur jubyr tevaavat zna cvpgher cneg jnf bqq naq uneqyl jbegu univat. Ubjrire gur prageny zlfgrel vf oevyyvnag – rfcrpvnyyl gung gur ebbz jnf bayl rire zrnag gb xvyy bapr – naq gur ernfba jul vg qvqa’g xvyy rirel gvzr.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. It was an interesting choice to name a character Jacques Futrelle – the name of a real person who wrote mysteries (like the classic “The Problem of Cell 13”

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes, I do love those little touches in the series (like a character in a later episode having the last name Fell). Lovely if you spot them, unobtrusive if you don’t!


  6. In the DVD box set issued in the UK, this episode has a DVD to itself, with extras. Two of them relate to the top of Metropolis, how the attic and roof were added by CGI to the top of the flat-roofed building used to shoot outside scenes! Also part of it is how they constructed the attic bedroom and ubj gurl qvq gur obbol-genccrq ongu naq gur gnax. Gurl znqr gur Avtugzner ebbz va gjb cnegf, fb gung gur onguebbz pbhyq or qrgnpurq naq fhccbegrq bire n fjvzzvat cbby. Nofbyhgryl oevyyvnag!

    Apparently this construction took about 4 weeks, to film 2 hours of TV!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s