February 2019 in Review

February 2019 was a bit of a landmark month for me in that it marked my first experience of putting a piece of my own mystery writing ‘out there’.

Those of you who follow me on Twitter will have seen me posting a few snapshots but basically I crafted a forensics mystery event for teens at work. The idea was to introduce teens to some basic techniques like fingerprinting, casting footprints and analysing data. This meant that I had to do a fair bit of research into forensic science but I also had to find some way of tying all of these tasks together. And this meant I had to do some writing (as well as a bit of diagram and floor plan creation).

My victim was Olga Olafson, a travel blogger and newly elected town councillor who was found dead in her armchair having been beaten on the back of the head with an oversized novelty ceramic garden gnome. All of the doors and windows to the house were locked with no sign that any had been picked or forced.

Footprint Analysis – after several false steps trying to leave a decent foot impression in soil I ended up having to use sand. The problem then is that the sand can shift when the dental stone is applied so you have to spray it with hair spray first.

Neighbors managed to identify exactly four suspects that the players had to consider, each with a unique motive. Environmentalist Harrison Smithers was angry that Olga ran a vicious election campaign against him, winning his seat. Jewelry designer Ariadne Templeton was upset that she paid for a joint holiday, maxing out her credit cards to do so, but was not reimbursed. Roxie Daytona, a children’s entertainer, was mad that her best friend left multiple anonymous scathing reviews of her business online. And then there was hot air balloon operator Phoenix Bolouri who was due to get married to her three days earlier but was left at the altar and subsequently dumped by text when Olga rekindled a previous relationship with a hovercraft engineer from Ottawa.

Okay, so I’m no Freeman Wills Crofts (though they did get to analyse five pages of phone records and plot distances on a map so I like to think he was with us in spirit) but I had a good time doing it. Even better, so did the teens who managed to piece the evidence together and solve the thing, seeing through a few red herrings to reach the correct conclusion. Still, as much fun as I had writing a mystery I think I’m quite happy to concentrate on writing about other people’s (far superior) efforts here going forward.

Speaking of which, it’s time to do that thing where I reflect on my month of reading. This past month I read:

Usually when I come to write these posts I have a pretty solid idea which book will win before I even sit down to review the contenders. This month however the field was much more even with no major disappointments (though Poirot Investigates is a little uneven, as is In The Fog) but also no runaway favorite.

Inevitably the books I am most drawn to on the list are the four inverted crime stories on the list. The Beast Must Die is a wonderfully structured and cleverly plotted story. Nothing More Than Murder features some really striking characterizations and there are some solid surprises along the way. And as for Devil in Dungarees, the book not only boasts a title that never fails to make me smile but it is a really engaging heist story that builds to a thrilling conclusion.

The fourth title however is the one that I think will stay with me longest. Julian Symons’ The Man Who Killed Himself is a very intelligently constructed play on one of the most lauded inverted mysteries written. Rather than just reusing ideas from Malice Aforethought, Symons presents his own spin on them, building a story that feels distinctive and often quite amusing.

The characters are splendid and I think the plotting is particularly strong, especially in the first two sections of the book. Along the way Symons presents the reader with several small surprises so I would suggest avoiding reading any detailed summaries before approaching it yourself (though my own review tries to be spoiler-free) and just tucking into it for yourself. It’s a great, fast read and well worth your time.

Finally, for those who keep track of such things I actually managed to stick to three of my four promised reviews from last month’s roundup post. I am pretty shocked to be honest. Anyway, in March expect to see reviews of books by Abir Mukherjee, Keigo Higashino and C. J. Tudor amongst others.

See you in March!

4 thoughts on “February 2019 in Review

  1. Thanks for bringing Julian Symons back to my attention. To date, I’ve only read ‘Plot against Roger Rider’ – in some ways slightly cringe-worthy in its ostensibly edgy characterisations with respect to sexuality, but nonetheless clever in its mystery. Personally I don’t especially enjoy inverted mystery fiction, but I should perhaps check this one out. Do I need to have read ‘Malice Aforethought’ first?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You don’t need to have read Malice Aforethought to understand and enjoy this – it just consciously mimics some aspects of the plot and twists them slightly. It is a separate work though and reading this wouldn’t spoil Malice for you.


  2. Sounds like you had a fun month, Aidan! And at the same time you managed to cram in a whole lot of reading and blogging as well! Good for you, and here’s hoping the coming months continue in that vein. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s